On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:23:34PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiу wrote: > > 9 нояб. 2015 г. 4:15 PM пользователь Vladimir Davydov > <vdavy...@virtuozzo.com> написал: > > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: > > > > > > > > > 09.11.2015 15:13, Andrew Vagin пишет: > > > >On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 07:37:31PM +0300, Evgenii Shatokhin wrote: > > > >>05.11.2015 18:45, Konstantin Khorenko пишет: > > > >>>Zenya, > > > >>> > > > >>>1) an idea from Volodya Davydov: we can store the pointer to > > > >>>ve_struct, > > > >>>not the veid, > > > >>> thus we'll eliminate possible races with veid reuse. > > > >>OK. > > > >>The main question is though, whether we should care about the > > > >>situations > > > >>where something is mounted from a VE and umounted from VE0. If we > > > >>should > > > >>not, it is not needed to change struct mount at all. > > > >We can't disable this operation, so I think we should. > > > > > > > > > > Could you elaborate on this, please? > > > Why should we care about such situations? > > > > external bind mounts are mounted from ve0 and can be unmounted from > > inside ve > > Ок. But what problems it could bring?
Unbalanced mnt_nr _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
