On 11/23/2015 07:04 PM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: > > > 23.11.2015 16:53, Andrey Ryabinin пишет: >> >> On 11/23/2015 06:46 PM, Stanislav Kinsburskiу wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> I'm curious, why network namespace is not reported as leaked... >>> >>>>> 3) This object holds network namespace. And it also have to be leaked >>>>> leaked after CT stop. Is it? >> Why do you think it leaked? >> How the rule could hold the namespace? > int fib_default_rule_add(struct fib_rules_ops *ops, > u32 pref, u32 table, u32 flags) > { > <snip> > r->fr_net = hold_net(ops->fro_net);
That is fib_rules_ops. ops not leaked, so net ns is also not leaking. We leaking fib_rule. > <snip> > return 0; > } > > But, probably, we have NETNS_REFCNT_DEBUG unset. And that's bad... > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel