No reasons to keep it along with optimization patches. See please the port I'll send soon today.

On 06/23/2016 10:25 AM, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
barrier code is broken in many ways:
Currently only ->dio_submit() handles PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_{FLUSH,FUA} correctly.
But request also can goes though ->dio_submit_alloc()->dio_submit_pad and 
write_page (for indexes)
So in case of grow_dev we have following sequance:

E_RELOC_DATA_READ:
              ->set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
               ->delta->allocate
                  ->io->submit_allloc: dio_submit_alloc
                    ->dio_submit_pad
E_DATA_WBI : data written, time to update index
               ->delta->allocate_complete:ploop_index_update
                 ->set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
                 ->write_page
                 ->ploop_map_wb_complete
                   ->ploop_wb_complete_post_process
                     ->set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
E_RELOC_NULLIFY:

                ->submit()

Once we have delayed_flush engine it is easy to implement correct scheme for
both engines.

E_RELOC_DATA_READ ->submit_allloc => wait->post_submit->issue_flush
E_DATA_WBI ->ploop_index_update with FUA
E_RELOC_NULLIFY ->submit: => wait->post_submit->issue_flush

This makes reloc sequence optimal:
RELOC_S: R1, W2,WAIT,FLUSH, WBI:FUA
RELOC_A: R1, W2,WAIT,FLUSH, WBI:FUA, W1:NULLIFY,WAIT, FLUSH

https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-47107
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonak...@openvz.org>
---
  drivers/block/ploop/dev.c     |  2 +-
  drivers/block/ploop/io_kaio.c |  3 +--
  drivers/block/ploop/map.c     | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ploop/dev.c b/drivers/block/ploop/dev.c
index 95e3067..090cd2d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ploop/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ploop/dev.c
@@ -2533,7 +2533,7 @@ restart:
                sbl.head = sbl.tail = preq->aux_bio;
/* Relocated data write required sync before BAT updatee */
-               set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
+               preq->req_rw |= REQ_FUA;
if (test_bit(PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_S, &preq->state)) {
                        preq->eng_state = PLOOP_E_DATA_WBI;
diff --git a/drivers/block/ploop/io_kaio.c b/drivers/block/ploop/io_kaio.c
index 5341fd5..5217ab4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ploop/io_kaio.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ploop/io_kaio.c
@@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ static void kaio_complete_io_state(struct ploop_request * 
preq)
        }
/* Convert requested fua to fsync */
-       if (test_and_clear_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state) ||
-           test_and_clear_bit(PLOOP_REQ_DEL_FLUSH, &preq->state) ||
+       if (test_and_clear_bit(PLOOP_REQ_DEL_FLUSH, &preq->state) ||
            test_and_clear_bit(PLOOP_REQ_KAIO_FSYNC, &preq->state))
                post_fsync = 1;
diff --git a/drivers/block/ploop/map.c b/drivers/block/ploop/map.c
index 3a6365d..ef351fb 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ploop/map.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ploop/map.c
@@ -901,6 +901,8 @@ void ploop_index_update(struct ploop_request * preq)
        int old_level;
        struct page * page;
        sector_t sec;
+       int fua = !!(preq->req_rw & REQ_FUA);
+       unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(preq->state);
/* No way back, we are going to initiate index write. */ @@ -954,12 +956,11 @@ void ploop_index_update(struct ploop_request * preq)
        plo->st.map_single_writes++;
        top_delta->ops->map_index(top_delta, m->mn_start, &sec);
        /* Relocate requires consistent writes, mark such reqs appropriately */
-       if (test_bit(PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_A, &preq->state) ||
-           test_bit(PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_S, &preq->state))
-               set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
-
-       top_delta->io.ops->write_page(&top_delta->io, preq, page, sec,
-                                     !!(preq->req_rw & REQ_FUA));
+       if (state & (PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_A_FL | PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_S_FL)) {
+               WARN_ON(state & PLOOP_REQ_DEL_FLUSH_FL);
+               fua = 1;
+       }
+       top_delta->io.ops->write_page(&top_delta->io, preq, page, sec, fua);
        put_page(page);
        return;
@@ -1063,7 +1064,7 @@ static void map_wb_complete_post_process(struct ploop_map *map,
         * (see dio_submit()). So fsync of EXT4 image doesnt help us.
         * We need to force sync of nullified blocks.
         */
-       set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &preq->state);
+       preq->req_rw |= REQ_FUA;
        top_delta->io.ops->submit(&top_delta->io, preq, preq->req_rw,
                                  &sbl, preq->iblock, 1<<plo->cluster_log);
  }
@@ -1153,8 +1154,10 @@ static void map_wb_complete(struct map_node * m, int err)
list_for_each_safe(cursor, tmp, &m->io_queue) {
                struct ploop_request * preq;
+               unsigned long state;
preq = list_entry(cursor, struct ploop_request, list);
+               state = READ_ONCE(preq->state);
switch (preq->eng_state) {
                case PLOOP_E_INDEX_DELAY:
@@ -1171,9 +1174,10 @@ static void map_wb_complete(struct map_node * m, int err)
                        if (preq->req_rw & REQ_FUA)
                                fua = 1;
- if (test_bit(PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_A, &preq->state) ||
-                           test_bit(PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_S, &preq->state))
-                               force_fua = 1;
+                       if (state & (PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_A_FL | 
PLOOP_REQ_RELOC_S_FL)) {
+                               WARN_ON(state & PLOOP_REQ_DEL_FLUSH_FL);
+                               fua = 1;
+                       }
preq->eng_state = PLOOP_E_INDEX_WB;
                        get_page(page);
@@ -1199,10 +1203,6 @@ static void map_wb_complete(struct map_node * m, int err)
        __TRACE("wbi2 %p %u %p\n", main_preq, main_preq->req_cluster, m);
        plo->st.map_multi_writes++;
        top_delta->ops->map_index(top_delta, m->mn_start, &sec);
-
-       if (force_fua)
-               set_bit(PLOOP_REQ_FORCE_FUA, &main_preq->state);
-
        top_delta->io.ops->write_page(&top_delta->io, main_preq, page, sec, 
fua);
        put_page(page);
  }

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to