The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-514.10.2.vz7.29.x-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git after rh7-3.10.0-514.10.2.vz7.29.3 ------> commit 7dcc64d7bb8a3dff22453d99046ade62cf72b28c Author: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz> Date: Thu Nov 26 19:28:26 2015 +0100
ms/TTY: n_hdlc, fix lockdep false positive The class of 4 n_hdls buf locks is the same because a single function n_hdlc_buf_list_init is used to init all the locks. But since flush_tx_queue takes n_hdlc->tx_buf_list.spinlock and then calls n_hdlc_buf_put which takes n_hdlc->tx_free_buf_list.spinlock, lockdep emits a warning: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 4.3.0-25.g91e30a7-default #1 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- a.out/1248 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&list->spinlock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01fd020>] n_hdlc_buf_put+0x20/0x60 [n_hdlc] but task is already holding lock: (&(&list->spinlock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01fdc07>] n_hdlc_tty_ioctl+0x127/0x1d0 [n_hdlc] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&list->spinlock)->rlock); lock(&(&list->spinlock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by a.out/1248: #0: (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff814c9eb0>] tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x20/0x50 #1: (&(&list->spinlock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01fdc07>] n_hdlc_tty_ioctl+0x127/0x1d0 [n_hdlc] ... Call Trace: ... [<ffffffff81738fd0>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x70 [<ffffffffa01fd020>] n_hdlc_buf_put+0x20/0x60 [n_hdlc] [<ffffffffa01fdc24>] n_hdlc_tty_ioctl+0x144/0x1d0 [n_hdlc] [<ffffffff814c25c1>] tty_ioctl+0x3f1/0xe40 ... Fix it by initializing the spin_locks separately. This removes also reduntand memset of a freshly kzallocated space. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit e9b736d88af1a143530565929390cadf036dc799) Cleanup, easier to apply next patch with it. https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-61963 Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khore...@virtuozzo.com> --- drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c b/drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c index 1b2db9a..f26657c 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c @@ -159,7 +159,6 @@ struct n_hdlc { /* * HDLC buffer list manipulation functions */ -static void n_hdlc_buf_list_init(struct n_hdlc_buf_list *list); static void n_hdlc_buf_put(struct n_hdlc_buf_list *list, struct n_hdlc_buf *buf); static struct n_hdlc_buf *n_hdlc_buf_get(struct n_hdlc_buf_list *list); @@ -855,10 +854,10 @@ static struct n_hdlc *n_hdlc_alloc(void) memset(n_hdlc, 0, sizeof(*n_hdlc)); - n_hdlc_buf_list_init(&n_hdlc->rx_free_buf_list); - n_hdlc_buf_list_init(&n_hdlc->tx_free_buf_list); - n_hdlc_buf_list_init(&n_hdlc->rx_buf_list); - n_hdlc_buf_list_init(&n_hdlc->tx_buf_list); + spin_lock_init(&n_hdlc->rx_free_buf_list.spinlock); + spin_lock_init(&n_hdlc->tx_free_buf_list.spinlock); + spin_lock_init(&n_hdlc->rx_buf_list.spinlock); + spin_lock_init(&n_hdlc->tx_buf_list.spinlock); /* allocate free rx buffer list */ for(i=0;i<DEFAULT_RX_BUF_COUNT;i++) { @@ -887,16 +886,6 @@ static struct n_hdlc *n_hdlc_alloc(void) } /* end of n_hdlc_alloc() */ /** - * n_hdlc_buf_list_init - initialize specified HDLC buffer list - * @list - pointer to buffer list - */ -static void n_hdlc_buf_list_init(struct n_hdlc_buf_list *list) -{ - memset(list, 0, sizeof(*list)); - spin_lock_init(&list->spinlock); -} /* end of n_hdlc_buf_list_init() */ - -/** * n_hdlc_buf_put - add specified HDLC buffer to tail of specified list * @list - pointer to buffer list * @buf - pointer to buffer _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel