From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@virtuozzo.com>

memcg will come in handy in get_scan_count().  It can already be used for
getting swappiness immediately in get_scan_count() instead of passing it
around.  The following patches will add more memcg-related values, which
will be used there.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@virtuozzo.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>

https://pmc.acronis.com/browse/VSTOR-19037

(cherry picked from commit 3337767850b490eec5ca822f871241c981664737)
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8ede70b78f6f..27aff034ce40 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -103,9 +103,6 @@ struct scan_control {
        /* Reclaim only slab */
        bool slab_only;
 
-       /* anon vs. file LRUs scanning "ratio" */
-       int swappiness;
-
        /*
         * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
         * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
@@ -2119,9 +2116,12 @@ enum scan_balance {
  * nr[0] = anon inactive pages to scan; nr[1] = anon active pages to scan
  * nr[2] = file inactive pages to scan; nr[3] = file active pages to scan
  */
-static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
-                          unsigned long *nr, unsigned long *lru_pages)
+
+static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+                          struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *nr,
+                          unsigned long *lru_pages)
 {
+       int swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
        struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
        u64 fraction[2];
        u64 denominator = 0;    /* gcc */
@@ -2163,7 +2163,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct 
scan_control *sc,
         * using the memory controller's swap limit feature would be
         * too expensive.
         */
-       if (!global_reclaim(sc) && !sc->swappiness) {
+       if (!global_reclaim(sc) && !swappiness) {
                scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
                goto out;
        }
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct 
scan_control *sc,
         * system is close to OOM, scan both anon and file equally
         * (unless the swappiness setting disagrees with swapping).
         */
-       if (!sc->priority && sc->swappiness) {
+       if (!sc->priority && swappiness) {
                scan_balance = SCAN_EQUAL;
                goto out;
        }
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct 
scan_control *sc,
         * With swappiness at 100, anonymous and file have the same priority.
         * This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
         */
-       anon_prio = sc->swappiness;
+       anon_prio = swappiness;
        file_prio = 200 - anon_prio;
 
        /*
@@ -2322,9 +2322,10 @@ static inline void init_tlb_ubc(void)
 /*
  * This is a basic per-zone page freer.  Used by both kswapd and direct 
reclaim.
  */
-static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
-                         unsigned long *lru_pages)
+static void shrink_zone_memcg(struct zone *zone, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+                             struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *lru_pages)
 {
+       struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
        unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
        unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
        unsigned long nr_to_scan;
@@ -2334,7 +2335,7 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct 
scan_control *sc,
        struct blk_plug plug;
        bool scan_adjusted;
 
-       get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr, lru_pages);
+       get_scan_count(lruvec, memcg, sc, nr, lru_pages);
 
        /* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
        memcpy(targets, nr, sizeof(nr));
@@ -2545,7 +2546,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
scan_control *sc,
                memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
                do {
                        unsigned long lru_pages, scanned;
-                       struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
                        if (!sc->may_thrash && mem_cgroup_low(root, memcg))
                                continue;
@@ -2553,9 +2553,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
scan_control *sc,
                        scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
 
                        if (!slab_only) {
-                               lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
-                               sc->swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
-                               shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc, &lru_pages);
+                               shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
                                zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
                        }
 
@@ -3128,11 +3126,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct 
mem_cgroup *memcg,
                .may_swap = !noswap,
                .order = 0,
                .priority = 0,
-               .swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg),
                .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
                .stat = &stat,
        };
-       struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
        unsigned long lru_pages;
 
        sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
@@ -3149,7 +3145,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct 
mem_cgroup *memcg,
         * will pick up pages from other mem cgroup's as well. We hack
         * the priority and make it zero.
         */
-       shrink_lruvec(lruvec, &sc, &lru_pages);
+       shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, &sc, &lru_pages);
 
        trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
 
-- 
2.19.2

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to