The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-1160.31.1.vz7.181.x-ovz" and will 
appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git
after rh7-3.10.0-1160.31.1.vz7.181.8
------>
commit 43abf6424d766e23d9479361b852b31f02b5fbe9
Author: Daeho Jeong <daeho.je...@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 22 21:51:22 2021 +0300

    ms/ext4: fix xfstest generic/269 double revoked buffer bug with bigalloc
    
        ms commit 9c02ac97989d
    
        When you repeatly execute xfstest generic/269 with bigalloc_1k option
        enabled using the below command:
    
        "./kvm-xfstests -c bigalloc_1k -m nodelalloc -C 1000 generic/269"
    
        you can easily see the below bug message.
    
        "JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh);"
    
        This means that an already revoked buffer is erroneously revoked again
        and it is caused by doing revoke for the buffer at the wrong position
        in ext4_free_blocks(). We need to re-position the buffer revoke
        procedure for an unspecified buffer after checking the cluster boundary
        for bigalloc option. If not, some part of the cluster can be doubly
        revoked.
    
        Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.je...@samsung.com>
    
    Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@virtuozzo.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 245e673..c8935c4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4723,22 +4723,11 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode 
*inode,
        ext4_debug("freeing block %llu\n", block);
        trace_ext4_free_blocks(inode, block, count, flags);
 
-       if (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET) {
-               struct buffer_head *tbh = bh;
-               int i;
-
-               BUG_ON(bh && (count > 1));
+       if (bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
+               BUG_ON(count > 1);
 
-               for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-                       cond_resched();
-                       if (!bh)
-                               tbh = sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb,
-                                                       block + i);
-                       if (!tbh)
-                               continue;
-                       ext4_forget(handle, flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA,
-                                   inode, tbh, block + i);
-               }
+               ext4_forget(handle, flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA,
+                           inode, bh, block);
        }
 
        /*
@@ -4783,6 +4772,19 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode 
*inode,
                        count += sbi->s_cluster_ratio - overflow;
        }
 
+       if (!bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
+               int i;
+
+               for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+                       cond_resched();
+                       bh = sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb, block + i);
+                       if (!bh)
+                               continue;
+                       ext4_forget(handle, flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA,
+                                   inode, bh, block + i);
+               }
+       }
+
 do_more:
        overflow = 0;
        ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &block_group, &bit);
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to