On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Itamar Heim <ih...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 07:51 PM, Liran Zelkha wrote: > >> The problem is with both updates and selects. >> For selects - to get all the information for the VDS we have multiple >> joins. Adding another one will hurt performance even more. >> For updates - we have vds_static thats hardly changed. vds_statistics >> that changes all the time. vds_dynamic is not changed allot - but is >> updated all the time because of the status. I think it's best to split >> it to the two existing tables (BTW - relevant for VM as well) >> > > but we don't update it unless the status has changed, which is a rare > occurance? > Actually - no. We can definitely see times we are updating vds_dynamic with no reason at all. I tried to create patches for that - but it happens from many different places in the code.
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
