----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francesco Romani" <from...@redhat.com> > To: devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:20:17 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] vdsm make rpm & make check on fe vs el > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> > > To: "Francesco Romani" <from...@redhat.com> > > Cc: devel@ovirt.org, "Mooli Tayer" <mta...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:16:11 PM > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] vdsm make rpm & make check on fe vs el > > > [...] > > > > > I've also saw a different numbers of tests running for make rpm on > > > > > el. > > > > > > > > I have seen this on several 6.5 machines - make rpm on does *not* run > > > > the tests. > > > > > > > > It would be nice if take a look at this. > > > > > > It was made on purposes: > > > > > > # Skips check since rhel default repos lack pep8 and pyflakes > > > %if ! 0%{?rhel} > > > %global with_check 1 > > > %endif > > > > > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/29213/ > > > > > > I believe time has come for a more robust solution > > > > As first aid, we should log something like "Skipping tests because ..." > > in this case. > > > > I think we need to change that so we disable only pep8 in make rpm. > > > > Nir > > +1 > > we can afford to skip local checks (pep8/pyflakes), but the core test suite > should run > anyway. > > I'll post a patch today(ish) if noone is faster/disagrees with the above :)
I don't think the tests should run on make rpm. In make check, sure. In make rpm... It's a last resort for making people realize something is broken when they are not running make check. > > > -- > Francesco Romani > RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D > Phone: 8261328 > IRC: fromani > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel