On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Max Kovgan <mkov...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Can you point me to the table? > You can inspect the code in ovirt-engine/packaging/dbscripts/upgrade/pre_upgrade/0000_config.sql > Sounds good exercise in b/w compatibility and slow data/schema migration > to me. > Is there an RFE for it too? > *Bug 995362* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995362> - ( ovirt_firewalld_support) [RFE] Support firewalld *Bug 1075687* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075687> - ( ovirt_setup_firewalld_support) [RFE] Add FirewallD support to hosted-engine setup > On Nov 12, 2015 5:27 PM, "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbona...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeut...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: >>> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: >>> >> >> Hey, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 >>> host >>> >> >> where you want to install vdsm onto? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Is vdsm taking care of it? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I'm asking this, because firewalld seems to be in the default >>> package >>> >> >> (please correct me if I am wrong) set of CentOS 7 and thus >>> installed >>> >> >> by default. >>> >> > >>> >> > As far as I know, Vdsm runs fine in parallel to firewalld on recent >>> >> > el7.1 (there used to be problems in early 7.0 versions). >>> >> > >>> >> > If this is not the case, please file a bug with precise versions! >>> >> >>> >> Bug 1281417 - vdsm host can not be added with firewalld enabled >>> > >>> > Would everything work all right if Vdsm's port (54321) is opened in >>> > firewalld? >>> >>> I did not try this yet - but I strongly assume yes. >>> >>> > It seems that the host CAN be added, but remains in non-responsive mode >>> > due to the firewall being shut. right? >>> >>> Correct, vdsm is up and all. It just seems to be the firewall. >>> >>> Looking at the two bugs: >>> Bug 995362 - (ovirt_firewalld_support) [RFE] Support firewalld >>> Bug 1281417 - vdsm host can not be added with firewalld enabled >>> >>> I wonder where the firewalld service configuration should happen, >>> currently in host-deploy, but I don#t really see why theer and not in >>> vdsm. >>> >> >> firewalld can't be configured right now by host-deploy being the firewall >> config sotred in the engine database for iptables only. >> We need to add firewalld support in ovirt-engine and in ovirt-host-deploy >> to properly support it. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> - fabian >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sandro Bonazzola >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >> See how it works at redhat.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel