On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Moti Asayag <masa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourf...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I think it was premature. >> >> I still see a lot of bugs to be fixed in 3.6.1. >> See query: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_status&y_axis_field=status_whiteboard&z_axis_field=target_milestone&no_redirect=1&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&deadlinefrom=&deadlineto=&bug_id=&bug_id_type=anyexact&target_milestone=ovirt-3.6.1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&emailtype3=substring&email3=&chfieldvalue=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&j_top=AND&n1=1&f1=status_whiteboard&o1=anywordssubstr&v1=docs%2Cnode&f2=flagtypes.name&o2=anywordssubstr&v2=&f3=noop&o3=noop&v3=&format=table&action=wrap >> >> And if looking only at blockers and exceptions I see 25 bugs still on >> new/assigned/post. >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_status&y_axis_field=status_whiteboard&z_axis_field=target_milestone&no_redirect=1&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&deadlinefrom=&deadlineto=&bug_id=&bug_id_type=anyexact&target_milestone=ovirt-3.6.1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&emailtype3=substring&email3=&chfieldvalue=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&j_top=AND&n1=1&f1=status_whiteboard&o1=anywordssubstr&v1=docs%2Cnode&f2=flagtypes.name&o2=anywordssubstr&v2=blocker%2Cexception&f3=noop&o3=noop&v3=&f4=noop&o4=noop&v4=&format=table&action=wrap >> >> Why not to do the branching later, when we get it more stable or push >> bugs out of it? >> > > +1, are there any stabilization criteria to determine when a code base is > considered stabilized enough for branching ? > > The branch is supposed to be the place where stabilization happen. The criteria is branch whenever a build is required. I've been asked to issue a build this morning so I branched. Too bad the request has been retired in the afternoon. > >> Thanks, >> Oved >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> just an heads up we branched for 3.6.1 stabilization this morning. >>> If you have patches targeted to 3.6.1 you now need to cherry-pick them >>> to 3.6.1 branch too. >>> A build is scheduled for today at 2 PM TLV time. >>> >>> -- >>> Sandro Bonazzola >>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >>> See how it works at redhat.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Moti > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel