I see though that is leaving a bunch of test interfaces in the slave:

2753: vdsmtest-gNhf3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN group default 
    link/ether 86:73:13:4c:e2:63 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
2767: vdsmtest-aX5So: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN group default 
    link/ether 9e:fa:75:3e:a3:e6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
2768: vdsmtest-crso1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN group default 
    link/ether 22:ce:cb:5c:42:3b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
2772: vdsmtest-JDc5P: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state UNKNOWN group default 
    link/ether ae:79:dc:e9:22:9a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff



Can we do a cleanup in the tests and remove those? That might collide with
other tests and create failures.

On 11/27 19:07, David Caro wrote:
> 
> I'm retriggering on another slave to see if it fails there too, might be env
> related. But that would not discard the race issue (as it might be just a
> coincidence or the slave a bit faster)
> 
> On 11/27 11:55, Francesco Romani wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Jenkins doesn't like my (trivial) https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/49271/
> > 
> > which is about moving one log line (!).
> > 
> > The failure is
> > 
> > 00:08:54.680 
> > ======================================================================
> > 00:08:54.680 FAIL: testEnablePromisc (ipwrapperTests.TestDrvinfo)
> > 00:08:54.680 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 00:08:54.680 Traceback (most recent call last):
> > 00:08:54.680   File 
> > "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc23-x86_64/vdsm/tests/ipwrapperTests.py",
> >  line 130, in testEnablePromisc
> > 00:08:54.680     "Could not enable promiscuous mode.")
> > 00:08:54.680 AssertionError: Could not enable promiscuous mode.
> > 00:08:54.680 -------------------- >> begin captured logging << 
> > --------------------
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /usr/sbin/brctl 
> > show (cwd None)
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip link add 
> > name vdsm-HIRjJp type bridge (cwd None)
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip link set 
> > dev vdsm-HIRjJp up (cwd None)
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip link set 
> > dev vdsm-HIRjJp promisc on (cwd None)
> > 00:08:54.680 root: DEBUG: SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0
> > 00:08:54.680 --------------------- >> end captured logging << 
> > ---------------------
> > 
> > 
> > Here in fullest: 
> > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc23-x86_64/638/console
> > 
> > The command like looks OK, and can't think any reason it could fail, except 
> > startup race.
> > Using taskset, the ip command now takes a little longer to complete.
> > 
> > Maybe -just wild guessing- the code isn't properly waiting for the command 
> > to complete?
> > Otherwise not the slightest clue :)
> > 
> > Bests,
> > 
> > -- 
> > Francesco Romani
> > RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
> > Phone: 8261328
> > IRC: fromani
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infra mailing list
> > in...@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> 
> -- 
> David Caro
> 
> Red Hat S.L.
> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> 
> Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> Email: dc...@redhat.com
> IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
> Web: www.redhat.com
> RHT Global #: 82-62605



-- 
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dc...@redhat.com
IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to