On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Moran Goldboim <mgold...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Moran Goldboim <mgold...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> my pov - really depends on when do we release 4.1. >>> short version (Dec 16) - we should keep it, and 3.6 api as well >>> long version (Mar 17) - let's drop it than. >>> >>> bottom line - we would like to give customers/community the time to >>> migrate their el6 base deployment to el7 , while allowing them dual >>> management infra. by march next year we should be in the 7.4/.next >>> timeframe - this should be ok to our conservative customer base as well >>> >> >> el6 to el7 host migration should have been done in 3.5. 3.6 doesn't >> support el6 as hosts... >> >> > busted here - you are right.. :) > the main point is to allow this deprecation to happen form our integration > projects and users side. if we will release early - i would suggest to keep > the support for additional version. > Keep support for what exactly? What can use the XML-RPC but our own internal tools (such as MOM) which we'll convert? Y. > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Yaniv Dary <yd...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> What is the cost of keeping them? >>>> >>>> Yaniv Dary >>>> Technical Product Manager >>>> Red Hat Israel Ltd. >>>> 34 Jerusalem Road >>>> Building A, 4th floor >>>> Ra'anana, Israel 4350109 >>>> >>>> Tel : +972 (9) 7692306 >>>> 8272306 >>>> Email: yd...@redhat.com >>>> IRC : ydary >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:13:40PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm still >>>>> > accept 3.5 engines - I guess we forgot to disable it in 4.0. >>>>> >>>>> Correct. There was a moment in time where we considered supporting 3.5 >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > In 4.1, I don't think we should support any 3.x Engine - otherwise we >>>>> > will have to waste time maintaining old apis and infrastructure, >>>>> instead >>>>> > of adding new features that matter to our users. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a list of old APIs you'd like to throw away? We've killed a >>>>> few in 4.0, and >>>>> $ git grep REQUIRED_FOR >>>>> is not huge. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > I suggest we disable now support for 3.x engines. >>>>> > >>>>> > Please see Eli patch: >>>>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/59308 >>>>> > >>>>> > Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> +1, but let's see if ydary/mgoldboi think we should keep 3.6. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sandro Bonazzola >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >> See how it works at redhat.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel