On 28 November 2016 at 09:31, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > The failure we see is what I'd expect from a very slow slave.
There are no more reasons of the slaves to be slow, and netlink events IMO should never have been slow (Completely unrelated to the storage which was the slow thing until we moved to local disks). Please investigate further, and open libvirt/oVirt bugs if you think the slave VMs are somehow inherently slow, as oVirt is not currently telling us the hyper-visors are overloaded in any way. -- Barak Korren bkor...@redhat.com RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team https://ifireball.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
