Greg, I'm sorry about that, I forgot to send official announcement about that.
I will do that asap. Martin On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gsher...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Greg Sheremeta <gsher...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File >> "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py", >> line 32, in <module> >> from ovirt_engine import service >> File >> "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py", >> line 35, in <module> >> from dateutil import tz >> ImportError: No module named dateutil >> > > Fixed with a simple 'sudo dnf install python-dateutil' > > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mper...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshi...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I >>> told >>> >>> Sandro that it is his call. >>> >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this >>> permutation >>> >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks all >>> >>> Gil >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoih...@redhat.com> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd >>> sm/vdsm_standard.yaml >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >>> >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since >>> fc24 >>> >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it >>> cannot be >>> >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >>> >> >>> >> [1] >>> >> >>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. >>> > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI >>> to be >>> > able to build and run it. >>> > We can't leave CI broken. >>> >>> Which CI job is broken with f25? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Sheremeta, MBA >> Red Hat, Inc. >> Sr. Software Engineer >> gsher...@redhat.com >> > > > > -- > Greg Sheremeta, MBA > Red Hat, Inc. > Sr. Software Engineer > gsher...@redhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel