On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more > importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures. > I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak slave utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older Fedora versions. I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide testing is useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time... Nir, with your experience - does it worth it? > > How about having "rawhide" as non-voting? > You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' script that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process return value. -- Barak Korren RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi Red Hat EMEA redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
