On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch= > flag%3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0% > 20status%3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified > we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers. > > We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch= > flag%3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0% > 20status%3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified > > 1525907 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage vdsm > General dan...@redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a restart in > fresh install... <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> > urgent urgent ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12 > > Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can > postpone to 4.2.1. > I don't think it is for me to review. The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage? Yaniv Bronheim, if we don't need to block on this, please tag VDSM for > release. > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel