Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 08:06 Kaustav Majumder < kmaju...@redhat.com> ha scritto:
> Hi, > We have tested gluster 6 by running pg bench on a vm. Things are working > fine. > Here are the results > https://github.com/ezio-auditore/gluster-pg-bench-test-results > > There is a small blog regarding this which is yet to be published. You can > check the preview. > > > https://ezio-auditore.github.io/devblog/gluster-3-12-vs-6-a-performance-oriented-overview > Thanks, I'll push patches for switching to Gluster 6 on master and if no regressions will be found I'll push to 4.3 too. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:03 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Il giorno ven 5 apr 2019 alle ore 12:56 Gobinda Das <go...@redhat.com> >> ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Simone, >>> Kaustav has upgraded from gluster-3.12 to gluster-6 and done some tests >>> like VM creation and some pg bench testing. >>> https://github.com/ezio-auditore/gluster-pg-bench-test-results >>> But yeah as you said will have to plan for end to end testing with fresh >>> installation also. >>> >> >> Gobinda, Sahina, Kaustav, any update on this testing? Are we ok to go >> with pushing the switch to Gluster 6 to master? >> One month passed and it's time to go on with this. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:31 PM Simone Tiraboschi <stira...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673058 the >>>> network throughput usage increases by a x5 upgrading from Gluster 3.12 to >>>> Gluster 5.y. >>>> >>>> This seems definitively problematic on our hyper-converged >>>> environments: I read more than one report where, over 1 Gbps network, >>>> sanlock could not be refreshed quickly enough and so killed the engine VM >>>> if not rebooted the host due to the watchdog. >>>> This is probably due to the fact that, according to that bug, the >>>> network got completely saturated. >>>> Faster networks seems still fine. >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673058 is probably going >>>> to be solved for Gluster 5.6. >>>> >>>> On the other side we have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1693998 >>>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693998> about rebasing >>>> over Gluster 6 which seems not affected by that issue. >>>> Do you have concrete plans about testing oVirt with Gluster 6? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Simone >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gobinda >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org >>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RFNOOVJAYJNQ7QZJSGECGO5LU3M4XX3V/ >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sandro Bonazzola >> >> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV >> >> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> sbona...@redhat.com >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> <https://redhat.com/summit> >> > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Kaustav Majumder > -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbona...@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://redhat.com/summit>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/OAP56YSVQSA6I4LFGGBIGK4MC4VNTNFT/
