On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:39 PM Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 29 Jan 2020, at 18:52, Amit Bawer <aba...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 29, 2020, Anton Marchukov <amarc...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All.
>>
>> I faced it multiple times during local runs, e.g. first it was missing
>> /tmp/otopi*. Now it fails for me on missing
>> /var/lib/pgsql/upgrade_rh-postgresql95-postgresql.log and /etc/dnf on
>> centos7 engine. It seems like any missing artifact during collection step
>> will fail the test.
>>
>> I understand some potential benefit of it, but I suggest we do not fail
>> it if we are unable to find any of the artifacts during collection step.
>> Better just to issue a warning in the logs and go on. If somebody needs to
>> test for particular log presence, I suggest it should be included as a test
>> step instead.
>>
>> Wdyt?
>
>
> +1
>
>
+1


> A step further,
> Could be very helpful if we could select the suites for OST during its
> launch since many times we are only interested in a specific component.
> For example: only run storage suite and don't care for ui browser suite
> when checking a storage change. This way we can avoid OST being shut
> completely when only one suite is broken which is not relevant to the
> change being verified.
>
>
(In addition to below:) If some test scenarios often fail, we should fix
them :-)


>
> Maybe you confuse suites with test scenarios? basic-suite-master has
> several scenarious, like 004_basic_sanity.py or 100_basic_ui_sanity.py.
> There’s no separate suite for UI or storage.
> If you’re referring to the scenarios - they are part of elementary sanity
> tests and as such we do want to run them every time, all of them.
>
> if you want to run individual scenarios/tests you can always just run OST
> yourself locally and invoke it yourself
>
> Thanks,
> michal
>
>
>
>> --
>> Anton Marchukov
>> Associate Manager - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/J3JZ337UJMBRBGUBPUIRA2T5NMNNPGE6/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/C2VWXDHCDU6EKJMRXDRVM4FDZELZHZ3Y/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/PMF4JXKW72WXNRNYKLS6NLDD72R7RHBS/
>


-- 
Didi
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/QMXTEA7YU63NVV7YQPWV3UUWU7AS2JM3/

Reply via email to