Hi! > >> DEVELHELP should not be used to change the semantics of things. > > > > Can you elaborate? > The system should behave the same whether develhelp is used or not.
I would claim that this is impossible. Even a simple puts() already affects
the timings, calls peripheral drivers, and may cause interrupts.
> then the application will work correctly (e.g., handle the error) with
> DEVELHELP and probably crash without. But DEVELHELP is supposed to
> expose bugs, not work around them. So in this example, the "return
> ERROR" should be omitted.
I would guess that going into LPM_SLEEP instead of LPM_IDLE has a similar
effect than calling additional printfs (which basically means that the effect
cannot be foreseen in most cases).
Cheers,
Oleg
--
dprintk(5, KERN_DEBUG "Jotti is een held!\n");
linux-2.6.6/drivers/media/video/zoran_card.c
pgpfE1lgGjxcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
