I'm second to Nick's sugestion. Nice to have 'make' to run unit tests and
compile examples.

Vào 19:00 Th 4, 02 thg 3 2016 DipSwitch <dipswi...@ownage4u.nl> viết:

> Would it be an idea to add a make commando to run most off the tests that
> travis runs? Like the static tests and different board builts, or a sub set.
>
> It would be great if this could be run from the RIOT root directory. :)
>
> Nick
> On 2 Mar 2016 11:59, "Francisco Javier Acosta Padilla" <
> francisco.aco...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> Some tears came out of my eyes when reading this message, I never gave
>> any thought to the T-guy, lots of pressure on him and nobody but you took
>> care of this…
>>
>> Thanks and next time we can try to be aware of this problem.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Paco.
>>
>>
>> On 2 March 2016 at 11:52:01, Oleg Hahm (oliver.h...@inria.fr) wrote:
>>
>> Hey Cenk!
>>
>> Thanks for this very important reminder!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Oleg
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:59:36AM +0100, Cenk Gündogan wrote:
>> > Dear Developers,
>> >
>> > This is a friendly reminder that we should take more care
>> > of our travis backlog.
>> >
>> > Everytime a pull request gets rebased/squashed/new commits
>> > travis will enqueue a new task. This enqueing takes up space
>> > in the travis backlog and hinders us from getting quick feedback
>> > about important pull requests, which are basically ready to merge.
>> >
>> > I know that everyone loves to see her/his pull request checked
>> > by travis as soon as possible as means of a smoke test,
>> > but this "first check" can almost always be done by compiling locally!
>> >
>> > So please follow these two steps:
>> > 1) If your pull request has commits with a message
>> > that includes "SQUASH" or "FIXME" then travis will fail
>> > anyways. So why let it enqueue at the first place?
>> > Please use "[ci skip]" somewhere in your commit message
>> > if this is the case. Travis will ignore a pull request if the last
>> > commit
>> > message has "[ci skip]" somewhere in it.
>> >
>> > 2) (Maintainers only) If you notice several jobs in Travis for the same
>> > pull request, then please take the initiative and stop old jobs
>> > for obsolete commits.
>> >
>> > I also know that it's sometimes inevitable, especially when the pull
>> request
>> > was already squashed and is basically ready to merge, but another small
>> > remark forces us to commit/amend a change. (This often happens at
>> > hack'n'acks)
>> > If a maintainer is involved in this, then again, a pointer to 2),
>> cancel
>> > jobs for obsolete commits.
>> >
>> > Take a glance at our current travis backlog [1]. The queue is still
>> full
>> > from yesterday's
>> > hack'n'ack session, and that was about 8-9 hours ago.
>> >
>> > Develop cautiously!
>> >
>> > Cenk
>> >
>> > [1] https://travis-ci.org/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull_requests
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel@riot-os.org
>> > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>> --
>> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Done reprogramming Xilinx, %d bits, good
>> luck!\n",...);
>> linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c
>> ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to