Hi,
Am 10/12/2016 um 04:37 PM schrieb Oleg Hahm:
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:57:50PM +0200, Ludwig Knüpfer wrote:
Am 12. Oktober 2016 09:48:28 MESZ, schrieb Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr>:
as far I'm concerned it has been an undocumented coding convention so far
to use `int` or `unsigned int` for iterator variables in a loop instead of
fixed width integer types. Does anybody object to adding this to the coding
conventions explicitly?
What about `size_t`?
I don't see a reason against `size_t` - but also no good reason that speaks
for it. What's the rationale?
size_t is suited best to be used for iterating array indices and never
overflow holding them [1].
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/2550799
Cheers,
Oleg
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Best regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
