On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > --- > cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c > b/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c > index 3d89f5f..4192b21 100644 > --- a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c > +++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c > @@ -52,13 +52,12 @@ rtems_rfs_scan_chain (rtems_chain_control* chain, > buffer = (rtems_rfs_buffer*) node; > > if (rtems_rfs_trace (RTEMS_RFS_TRACE_BUFFER_CHAINS)) > - printf ("%" PRIuPTR " ", ((intptr_t) buffer->user)); > + printf ("%p ", buffer->user); > > if (((rtems_rfs_buffer_block) ((intptr_t)(buffer->user))) == block) > { > if (rtems_rfs_trace (RTEMS_RFS_TRACE_BUFFER_CHAINS)) > - printf (": found block=%" PRIuPTR "\n", > - ((intptr_t)(buffer->user))); > + printf (": found block=%p\n", buffer->user); What is the warning this fixed? The "PRIuPTR" should be the right way to print an (unsigned) pointer. Perhaps changing the cast to (uintptr_t) would fix the warning?
> > (*count)--; > rtems_chain_extract_unprotected (node); > -- > 1.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel