The comment is rather weak On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> --- > cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h | 4 +++- > cpukit/score/src/threadmp.c | 40 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > cpukit/score/src/threadqenqueue.c | 11 ++++++----- > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > @@ -74,7 +96,13 @@ Thread_Control *_Thread_MP_Allocate_proxy ( > > the_proxy->current_state = _States_Set( STATES_DORMANT, the_state ); > > - the_proxy->Wait = _Thread_Executing->Wait; > + the_proxy->Wait.id = executing->Wait.id; > + the_proxy->Wait.count = executing->Wait.count; > + the_proxy->Wait.return_argument = > executing->Wait.return_argument; > + the_proxy->Wait.return_argument_second = > executing->Wait.return_argument_second; > + the_proxy->Wait.option = executing->Wait.option; > + the_proxy->Wait.return_code = executing->Wait.return_code; > + the_proxy->Wait.timeout_code = > executing->Wait.timeout_code; > > _Chain_Append( &_Thread_MP_Active_proxies, &the_proxy->Active ); > > Does this really not line up or is it just the email client? --joel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel