On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 18:49, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> This patch series replaces the mongoose webserver by its still MIT >> licensed fork civetweb. >> >> Please note that I try to get some (currently two) of the patches >> directly into civetweb too. But I think that it might need some time and >> adaption till they are accepted. So I thought that adding them to RTEMS >> would still make sense as a working interim solution. >> >> > Would we be better served by providing this as an external 3rd party > package via the RSB and we remove the code or add a configure disable? The > package could be used by both stacks. > > We have plans to remove the existing stack from the source tree and to > make a separate package and I guess at that point in time all dependent > client networking code in the source tree will also need to be removed. > > I think this is an excellent idea and starts to move us down the path of + base RTEMS without network stack + choice of network stack in separate repo (current, rtems-libbsd, or LwIP) + RSB packages for services. The RSB packages deal nicely with patches that need to go upstream. --joel > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel