On 28/09/16 10:47, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 28/09/16 10:38, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Sebastian and Gedare,

I cannot hold myself to not express my opinion there.

On Wednesday 28 of September 2016 07:52:51 Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27/09/16 16:59, Gedare Bloom wrote:
A mostly unrelated question: why do we have two different
_Semaphore_Get functions, one static in score/src/semaphore.c and the
other inlined from semimpl.h?
Yes, this is a bit confusing. One is part of the Classic API, the other
is for the self-contained semaphores.
what is the reason to name these self-contained semaphores.

the name "self-contained" is used for objects which work with a user supplied storage. For example:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h;h=c261adf681e542af945969149f6533248eb06fd6;hb=HEAD

In contrast to the Classic and POSIX objects which work with a kernel supplied storage which is accessed via the object identifier.

In the context of the Newlib <sys/lock.h> a "semaphore" is a counting semaphore.

In case the name "self-contained" is confusing for this purpose, then I am happy to replace it with a better alternative.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to