On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:26 AM, punit vara <punitv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I think RTEMS don't have any IoT protocol so I propose we should >> implement at least two important IoT protocols >> >> 1. MQTT (http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/mqtt-v3.1.1.html) >> 2. CoAP (http://coap.technology/) >> > Why are these 2 important? These two are currently latest protocol some IoT devices use. MQTT is specially for small footprint devices and I believe RTEMS has potential to run on small foot print devices. Both protocol will good addition to show RTEMS as IoT OS.
> > The problem to avoid is adopting a network protocol too early, because > there is always a bunch of competing ones, and in the end only a > handful will survive in the long term. > >> >> What's your opinion on this ? :) >> > This may be a good idea. What is the state of industry and of > standardization in this space? Are there open-source reference > implementations with a useful (BSD/MIT) license? > > Gedare > >> >> Regards >> Punit Vara _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel