On 2017-07-14 12:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Its not good that you patch RTEMS to get something useful for the users
of RTEMS on your chips. Why can't you add this probing stuff to RTEMS
mainline?
As I understood it we have tried to push this patch to mainline before,
but it was not accepted. We could make a new attempt after the vacation
period.
We should probably
1. remove the -msoft-float,
2. enable SPARC_USE_SAFE_FP_SUPPORT for all configurations (see also
test case spcontext01), and
3. add a deferred floating-point save for uniprocessor configurations.
Sounds like a good idea. I will revise my patch and remove -msoft-float.
--
Daniel Cederman
Software Engineer
Cobham Gaisler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
