Hey Guillaume! >I am wondering what tools are currently used for visualizing the resulting RTEMS trace, if any. And what are your plan on this aspect once you can output CTF traces with >RTEMS?
RTEMS wiki pages do suggest using trace compass for the purpose of visualization of traces [1]. It seems like a good choice. >There is currently interest in providing support for generic RTOS support in Trace Compass [1], which I'll be working on soon. If we could coordinate on this aspect >regarding traced events, I think we could achieve interesting things. For sure! I look forward to it. >Also, my two cent for your question is that you are much better integrating CTF gen directly in RTEMS if modification to babeltrace source code would be required. I think it >would be simpler to upstream your changes that way. Yes that would be simpler. But at some point in time I will have to decide on a CTF structure for the output traces. I suspect this knowledge will also be used when changing the babeltrace source code for RTEMS trace format conversion. And hence the urgent need for advice :p Thanks for the input:) Vidushi On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Guillaume Champagne < guillaume.champa...@polymtl.ca> wrote: > Hi Vidushi, > > I am not answering on the mailing list, because I am not sure if my > questions were already answered previously. > > If I understand correctly, the first part of your GSOC project is to > integrate CTF traces to kernel level event in RTEMS? > I am wondering what tools are currently used for visualizing the resulting > RTEMS trace, if any. And what are your plan on this aspect once you can > output CTF traces with RTEMS? > > There is currently interest in providing support for generic RTOS support > in Trace Compass [1], which I'll be working on soon. If we could coordinate > on this aspect regarding traced events, I think we could achieve > interesting things. > > Also, my two cent for your question is that you are much better > integrating CTF gen directly in RTEMS if modification to babeltrace source > code would be required. I think it would be simpler to upstream your > changes that way. > > [1] http://tracecompass.org/ > > Guillaume > > Vidushi Vashishth <reachv...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Hi! >> >> I have written a blog post (https://vidushivashishth.gith >> ub.io/sixthpost/) >> summarizing two approaches to CTF generation that I can employ at this >> point. I prefer on working with the barectf approach. The only blocker >> that >> exists with this approach is deciding on a YAML configuration [1] for >> defining the structure of the CTF traces. This will be the input to the >> barectf. I needed advice on how to go about this. >> >> References: >> [1] >> https://github.com/efficios/barectf/wiki/Writing-the-YAML-co >> nfiguration-file >> >> Thanks, >> Vidushi >> > > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel