On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 8:43 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 17/8/19 7:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > FWIW the repo is git clone git://git.rtems.org/multiio.git > > > > More below > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:20 PM Wendell Silva <silv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Well, I'm a non-OAR user with at least one customer 100% satisfied with > multi-io lib. > >> > >> Suppose I'm going to championize it, how do I do to get started? > > > > I'm glad you are happy with it. I was happy with it on the robotic > project > > I did with it. > > This repo could be added to the RSB as a package. It has been converted to > rtems_waf however it would be good to have the support changed from the > files > being in the multiio repo to a submodule referring to the rtems_waf repo. > > Can the package be built for all BSPs? > > It would need to be documented. I was considering adding a Packages > chapter to > the User Manual and it could be a section under that chapter. >
Personally, I think there are only two things of long-term value in it. A few shell commands and an interface to access discretes and analogs. If the interface is just considered a shim layer that an application can implement, then it is independent of any bsp. A system with multiple IO cards is abstracted through this by the system integrator. Is it worth being independent then? The two drivers in there now are PC-104 so only available to pc386 and possibly not even compatible with anything you can buy now. One was based on a single chip solution so may be available in later incarnations and for other buses. No idea though. I don't mind treating it as a small package either. If we want to show how one should be done, this is small enough to be an example. > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel