----- Am 3. Feb 2020 um 1:14 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > On 2/2/20 1:28 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> ----- Am 20. Jan 2020 um 6:01 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >> >>> On 17/12/19 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> My experience tells me that doing a BSP development without a debugger is a >>>> waste of time. >>> >>> Sometimes getting a working debugger is more effort than getting a BSP to >>> work. >>> The Pi is an example. I believe Alan used print statements. >> >> Ok, what do you think about a new configuration option: >> >> CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION > > CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_SYS_INIT ?
In v2 of the patch set I named it CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION. I am not in favour of abbreviations, since they are in general not used in the configuration options. More precise would be CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION. It is longer, but would be not the longest configuration option name (e.g. CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CONSOLE_DRIVER is longer). So, what about this one? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
