On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 7:43 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 09/04/2020 14:40, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 7:28 AM Utkarsh Rai <utkarsh.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am willing to add tests for clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC. What >> is the standard way of adding test for an already present API but with >> different configuration? For eg. should I add 'psxtmclocknanosleep04/ 05/ >> 06' in the testsuite? >> > > Yes. That is the pattern. > > We should try to reduce the count of test programs since on boards with a > long reboot time, more tests programs means much more test time (compared > to the new test cases alone). > And there is the competing factor that you end up with test executables that are overly complex, do not have clean environments for many of the test cases, and are too large to fit on many target boards. I know you have seen how long the list is of tests that you can't run on many boards. That's a bad quality attribute --jo >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
