On 31/07/2020 22:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 3:04 PM Jonathan Brandmeyer > <jbrandme...@planetiq.com <mailto:jbrandme...@planetiq.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:43 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org > <mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > Hi > > Do any of the existing Zynq variants work on those? I recall > posts about using them but not which variant was used. > > > The zedboard BSP works as-is on the microzed. However, you almost > certainly want to set BSP_ZYNQ_RAM_LENGTH=1024M to get access to all > of the DRAM. > > The BSP also works as-is on the 7020 and 7030 Zynq family members as > well. > > > Thanks. > > Anyone with suggestions on how to make this more obvious? Should we add > a couple more BSP variants here like we have in the SPARC BSPs to make > things clear to end users? > > --joel
Hello Joel, first a confirmation from my side: I had to do with a customer board that used a Picozed 7030 just recently. It worked well. If you need a more detailed configure line, I can look it up. I don't think that adding more BSP variants would be an optimal solution if no adaption is necessary for a specific variant. That will only lead to a longer build time if you want to build all BSPs. How about adding a bit more information like a list of boards the BSP can handle in the user manual? We have a big Board Support Packages section for that: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/index.html I did something like that when I extended the imx BSP to support i.mx6ul/ull too: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/bsps-arm.html#id11 Best regards Christian > > > -- > Jonathan Brandmeyer > PlanetiQ > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel