On 29/09/2020 15:47, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/09/2020 15:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:37 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
Hello,
I work currently on the documentation of the IO Manager. What is the
purpose of
typedef rtems_status_code rtems_device_driver;
?
For me this looks a bit like camouflage.
No. It is a use of typedef to make the purpose of the method clear.
You have nibbled at these for years. There were at least types for
Classic Tasks, ASRs, and TSRs at one point.
Yes, the typedefs to void.
If this is the last one, I'm not going to fight it. This isn't the
hill I am
going to die on.
I am not suggesting to remove them although I find these typedefs
pretty odd. I just look for some documentation text.
What about this:
/**
* @ingroup RTEMSAPIClassicIO
*
* @brief This type shall be used in device driver entry declarations and
* definitions.
*
* Device driver entries return an #rtems_status_code status code. This
type
* definition helps to document device driver entries in the source code.
*/
typedef rtems_status_code rtems_device_driver;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
