On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 20:07, Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> wrote:
> This ensures that the saved SP register is sized appropriately depending > on the chosen ABI and prevents a warning in the libmisc stack checker. > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h > b/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h > index da2140a2a8..b33f6a1c85 100644 > --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h > +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h > @@ -489,7 +489,10 @@ typedef struct { > #ifdef AARCH64_MULTILIB_ARCH_V8_ILP32 > uint32_t _register_lr_top; > #endif > - uint64_t register_sp; > + uintptr_t register_sp; > +#ifdef AARCH64_MULTILIB_ARCH_V8_ILP32 > + uint32_t _register_sp_top; Won’t uintptr_t work here (and for all of the other integer registers) as well and consequently we get rid of all of such multiarch ifdefs? > +#endif > void *register_pc; > #ifdef AARCH64_MULTILIB_ARCH_V8_ILP32 > uint32_t _register_pc_top; -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Hesham
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel