On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:29 AM Rohan kumar <krohan8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually I followed this document > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/start/bsp-build.html#quickstartbspbuild-manual > to > build bsp manually > as mentioned in the "GSoc getting started" blog. > > Also yes when I run "./waf" command "Waf: Leaving directory > `/home/rohan/devlopment/src/rtems/build/sparc/erc32' > " this was the final output as you said. > > But I am actually stuck in running Hello world program > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/start/gsoc.html#prove-you-can-work-on-rtems > this > document says to run "make" command but the folder "/build/b-erc32" is > empty. So I was confused about how to run Hello world. > It should be under rtems/build. Do a "find build -name hello.exe" and then follow the remaining instructions. Unfortunately, I think this is a specific example of https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4130 which when filed said there were more than a few references to the old build system in the documentation. If you can provide a patch for the docs to reflect the current waf procedure, that would be appreciated. Good exercise for GSoC preparation. :) --joel > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 6:43 AM Rohan kumar <krohan8...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> I am trying to run Hello World program but when run the command "make" >>> to build, the error came "make: *** No targets specified and no makefile >>> found. Stop". Actually there is nothing in the "/build/b-erc32" folder >>> its just empty and >>> >> >> I'm not sure what you did. The mention of b-erc32 hints at configure and >> autotools but you mention waf. Waf leaves the results in rtems/build and >> you run waf again. >> >> This seems to be mixing the old and new build infrastructure instructions. >> >> Is there something that needs more attention in the documentation as we >> move to waf only? >> >> >> >> also there in the step "Test a BSP" I got two failures too. >>> >> >> These results look pretty good. Minimum probably needs to be addressed >> from a tester perspective and sometimes the DL tests fail as the tools >> update. >> >>> >>> " >>> Passed: 557 >>> Failed: 2 >>> User Input: 6 >>> Expected Fail: 1 >>> Indeterminate: 0 >>> Benchmark: 3 >>> Timeout: 0 >>> Test too long: 0 >>> Invalid: 0 >>> Wrong Version: 0 >>> Wrong Build: 0 >>> Wrong Tools: 0 >>> ------------------ >>> Total: 569 >>> Failures: >>> dl06.exe >>> minimum.exe >>> User Input: >>> capture.exe >>> dl10.exe >>> top.exe >>> fileio.exe >>> termios.exe >>> monitor.exe >>> Expected Fail: >>> psxfenv01.exe >>> Benchmark: >>> linpack.exe >>> dhrystone.exe >>> whetstone.exe >>> Average test time: 0:00:00.283888 >>> Testing time : 0:02:41.532720 >>> >>> " >>> >>> I am currently working on the master branch and trying to build >>> sparc-erc32. Do I have to run the ./waf again I am not sure any direction >>> will be very helpful. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@rtems.org >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel