On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:49 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 27/2/21 4:40 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:13 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:12 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:06 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>>> On 26/2/21 4:49 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> The stand-alone repository is very close to completion now and I could > >>>>> use the networking01 test with the standalone repo and it successfully > >>>>> runs on pc-qemu. [...] > >>>> Do we need a LICENSE file? > >>>> > > Do we? > > I think it helps but I am not sure what it would contain. Joel? >
It could help to explain the license situation. The existing files either refer: 2/3/4-clause BSD licenses from original sources 2-clause BSD licenses for relicensed code from rtems relicensing effort RTEMS license via http://www.rtems.org/license/LICENSE. Every file should have the license identified, but a LICENSE file can be added with this kind of information about the licensing that applies. Since we don't really want to encourage use in new products I wouldn't put too much effort to document how people should use it. Let them come and ask us. :) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel