On 6/3/21 6:04 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >> On 05/03/2021 19:40, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 12:25 PM Sebastian Huber >>> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >>> <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/03/2021 16:27, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> > Should we add a macro for this, e.g., "RTEMS_CASE_NO_BREAK" so >>> that we >>> > can update them in future if needed for other tools? >>> I would just pick a name which is understood by GCC, clang, and >>> Coverity. I guess other tools will understand this or why did you >>> buy them? >>> >>> >>> Well we didn't pay for any of those but are you wanting a macro or >>> just the comment? >> >> I would just use a comment which is understood by GCC, clang, and >> Coverity. What does Linux use? >> > That's fine, if there is a de facto standard to use, we can go for it.
Looking at the option documentation gcc supports a lot of different possible ways and the warning option can change what is selected. Do we allow all that gcc allows? I hope not. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel