https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12FkAE6Wvo0dDw9D75p-w8UISc8_aOKQqntvruGGdeN4/edit#gid=0
This sheet has rtems-test result comparisons between different SMP schedulers set as default schedulers and has results from last the 2 months. This might be of help to you. On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 9:50 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> On 27/03/2021 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> > The issue I found is different and won't happen on every target or >> > bsp. >> > >> > Psim has 6-9 failures even after freeing the right stack address. >> > >> > >> > The stack address and now (I think) size saved for later use are wrong >> > and this leads to multiple failures. >> I work on a fix. psim seems to be a good platform for these tests. >> > > I put a patch for the address issue but I think the fundamental issue is > you changed the semantics of what was stored in the stack structure. You > probably want a different approach but this is at least a good > temporary fix. > > And something different on Libbsd. But not sure. > > I think Richi has raised the issue that there are some recently introduced > failures. Not sure how many are this. > >> >> -- >> embedded brains GmbH >> Herr Sebastian HUBER >> Dornierstr. 4 >> 82178 Puchheim >> Germany >> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 >> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 >> >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München >> Registernummer: HRB 157899 >> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler >> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: >> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ >> >> _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel