Hello All, Just a gentle reminder to please help me review this my proposal draft and help me with ways to make it better :) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VADJh3_kIhs578IEmBJ98rjR6p5E1XcksUkq1Ms4jRA/edit?usp=sharing
Cheers, Ida On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, 6:51 am Ida Delphine, <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > Here is the link to my GSoC proposal. Will love if you leave comments on > ways I could make it better or any corrections (Especially the *Proposesd > Schedule* section so that I will be sure about my project deliverables > when inputting them). > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VADJh3_kIhs578IEmBJ98rjR6p5E1XcksUkq1Ms4jRA/edit?usp=sharing > I will also love to know about any future improvements to this project. > > Cheers, > Ida. > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:27 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:11 AM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > In case I succeed with this project will I be required to do some >> documentation on how it works? >> > >> Yes, in general we expect students to produce documentation while they >> work on also creating code. >> >> I think the direction we're heading right now is toward using >> clang-format, perhaps with an update to a common coding style. In this >> case, we solve our problem by policy rather than technical solution, >> and your work should focus on tool integration and automation without >> concern about the coding style itself. >> >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:51 AM Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 07/04/2021 09:03, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> >> >> > Would it be pragmatic to review these cases and change the standard? >> >> >> >> I sent a patch to review the format changes done by clang-format >> recently: >> >> >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-April/066311.html >> >> >> >> It doesn't look that bad from my point of view. Fixing the alignment >> >> issue would make it even better: >> >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D27651 >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I understand the long history but as you point out we either invest >> in the tools >> >> > to support the format, we change what we have or we manage it >> manually. >> >> I would prefer to change the style and use a widely used formatting >> >> tool. I think we spend to much time on the coding style in reviews. >> This >> >> is quite bad since we are all busy with all sorts of things and our >> time >> >> is better spent on more important tasks. A consistently formatted >> source >> >> code is very important, but enforcing this style manually is a waste of >> >> time. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> embedded brains GmbH >> >> Herr Sebastian HUBER >> >> Dornierstr. 4 >> >> 82178 Puchheim >> >> Germany >> >> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> >> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 >> >> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 >> >> >> >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München >> >> Registernummer: HRB 157899 >> >> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler >> >> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: >> >> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> devel mailing list >> >> devel@rtems.org >> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel