On 16/4/21 11:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 16/04/2021 15:05, Kinsey Moore wrote: > >> Yes, that's currently the case for non-aarch64 platforms. The test is set to >> require aarch64 as a result. > > How do you get this information from the documentation? > > In case this is something which potentially every CPU port can implement, then > the implementation interface should be in the _CPU_* scope. You may also add > something like CPU_HAS_EXCEPTION_TO_SIGNAL_MAPPINGS_SUPPORT TRUE/FALSE. >
I do not believe the interfaces are strong enough to be rolled out across a number of architectures. I have raised this in the other thread. I think there are competing uses for the exception resource. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel