This fixes a bug where addresses were not being aligned correctly. Addresses used in cache functions are now aligned consistently using RTEMS_ALIGN_DOWN. --- bsps/aarch64/shared/cache/cache.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/aarch64/shared/cache/cache.c b/bsps/aarch64/shared/cache/cache.c index ce2e130abe..47722c21e4 100644 --- a/bsps/aarch64/shared/cache/cache.c +++ b/bsps/aarch64/shared/cache/cache.c @@ -39,11 +39,9 @@ #include <bsp/utility.h> #include <rtems/score/aarch64-system-registers.h> -#define AARCH64_CACHE_L1_CPU_DATA_ALIGNMENT ((size_t)64) -#define AARCH64_CACHE_L1_DATA_LINE_MASK \ - ( AARCH64_CACHE_L1_CPU_DATA_ALIGNMENT - 1 ) -#define AARCH64_CACHE_PREPARE_MVA(mva) \ - ((const void *) (((size_t) (mva)) & AARCH64_CACHE_L1_DATA_LINE_MASK)) +#define AARCH64_CACHE_L1_CPU_DATA_ALIGNMENT ( (size_t) 64 ) +#define AARCH64_CACHE_PREPARE_MVA(mva) (const void *) \ + RTEMS_ALIGN_DOWN ( (size_t) mva, AARCH64_CACHE_L1_CPU_DATA_ALIGNMENT ) static inline void AArch64_data_cache_clean_and_invalidate_line(const void *d_addr) @@ -75,7 +73,7 @@ _CPU_cache_flush_data_range( { _AARCH64_Data_synchronization_barrier(); if ( n_bytes != 0 ) { - size_t adx = (size_t) d_addr & ~AARCH64_CACHE_L1_DATA_LINE_MASK; + size_t adx = (size_t) AARCH64_CACHE_PREPARE_MVA ( d_addr ); const size_t ADDR_LAST = (size_t) d_addr + n_bytes - 1; for (; adx <= ADDR_LAST; adx += AARCH64_CACHE_L1_CPU_DATA_ALIGNMENT ) { @@ -116,8 +114,7 @@ _CPU_cache_invalidate_data_range( ) { if ( n_bytes != 0 ) { - size_t adx = (size_t) d_addr - & ~AARCH64_CACHE_L1_DATA_LINE_MASK; + size_t adx = (size_t) AARCH64_CACHE_PREPARE_MVA ( d_addr ); const size_t end = (size_t)d_addr + n_bytes -1; /* Back starting address up to start of a line and invalidate until end */ -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel