On 22/7/21 5:08 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/07/2021 21:04, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >>> On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>> Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want >>>> this code... >>> The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we >>> can't test the extended interrupts. In production, you want tested code. >>> >> ok, thanks. My comments are all pretty minor, except for the >> terminology issues of "cause" but that wording already exists. post >> the v2 series, but I probably won't review it and you can check it in >> if no one complains. It's up to you if you want to work a different >> wording than "cause" -- I prefer "raise" > > Thanks a lot for the review. > > Joel, what is your opinion with respect to "cause" vs. "raise"? >
I think `raise`. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel