On 28/7/21 12:13 am, Alex White wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:46 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> On 27/7/21 3:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> > On 27/07/2021 05:30, Alex White wrote: >> >> This prevents patches with the same name from conflicting and causing >> >> the build to fail. >> > >> > Why can't the patches have a unique file name? >> >> Yeap and if specific to Xilinx and their repos it should be labelled in a >> manner >> that highlights that. Further you cannot create a release without unique file >> names because we have a single source directory .... >> >> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.1/sources/ >> >> And I see no reason to change this. > > I just realized that even if I separate these patches by build name, the > problem > would remain that patches for the same build item with the same name (however > improbable they are) would conflict. > > It looks like it would be better for me to create an RTEMS ticket to hold > these > patches and rename them to work around this issue. I'll do that.
Alex, Could you please explain what the issue is rather than presenting us with solutions we then reject? I have no idea what the problem is you are attempting to solve. Please do not create a ticket until there is general agreement this is the best solution. Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
