On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:52 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 15/9/21 4:49 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 7:02 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org > > <mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:54 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > > On 13/9/21 11:20 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > If building a bset tar file, does it matter if the installation > > prefix > > > > is writable? > > > > > > > > ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --bset-tar-file --log=l-i386.txt > > > > --prefix=/rtems/tools 5/rtems-i386 > > > > RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 5 (c7870f6e6199) > > > > error: prefix is not writable: /rtems/tools > > > > > > > > It does if you are planning to immediately install but if building > > for > > > > later installation, I don't think it matters. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > What happens if you add --no-install? > > > > It skips the test. > > > > And doesn't install anything. > > Excellent. > > > > If this does help the question moves to if making a bset is packaging > > around an > > > install or is it the only output option? > > > > With a bset-tar, I don't think it did an install anyway. But it's been > > a long day. I can > > check again tomorrow if you want me to. > > > > Builds and installs tools unless you specify no install. > > > > Tar files is an additive behavior. > > OK and thanks > > > I am off today but will try to review the help and user docs to make sure > > this > > is clear. > > > > Any thoughts on the tools tarballs not having the architecture name in it? > > If > > you build multiple architectures or just want to maintain tool tarballs for > > multiple architectures, you have to manually rename them. > > Could you please remind me about the naming and then what you would like?
After building tools for ARM for RTEMS 5, this is what is in the tar/ directory. + ls -1 tar automake-1.12.6-x86_64-linux-gnu-1.tar.bz2 rtems-tools-0a5d2057749066e7d184836e92c7ce5334fccc90-1.tar.bz2 I wondered where autoconf was and it is in the automake tarball. Either autoconf should be in a separate tarball of the tarfile should be autotools like is used in the bsets. Not sure which but just saying automake-1.12.6 and including autoconf is not right. The issue I mentioned is that the same rtems-tools-@t...@-1.tar.bz2 is used for every architecture. Perhaps rtems-tools-@ARCH@-@t...@-1.tar.bz2. Then you can script building all architectures without renaming files. One thing I also noticed which might cause problems with people feeding the tools tarball into another packaging system is that there are duplicate files across architectures. I don't see the RSB addressing this but someone creating RPM, deb, etc packages might have to. If post processing is needed to break out a rtems-tools-common tarball, that is on someone feeding these into something that doesn't like duplicate files in packages. So.. (1) automake has autoconf also and (2) same name is used for rtems-tools independent of architecture. --joel > > Thanks > Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
