On 04/07/2022 03:43, Chris Johns wrote:
On 1/7/2022 11:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Use the existing WRITE_SR() abstraction to access the interrupt group 0 and 1
enable registers.  This fixes the build for the AArch32 target.
---
  bsps/include/dev/irq/arm-gicv3.h              | 30 ++++++++-----------
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/a53/grp.yml           |  2 ++
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/a53/obj.yml           |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/a72/grp.yml           |  2 ++
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/a72/obj.yml           |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/grp.yml               |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/xilinx-versal/grp.yml |  2 ++
  spec/build/bsps/aarch64/xilinx-versal/obj.yml |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/arm/fvp/grp.yml               |  2 ++
  spec/build/bsps/arm/fvp/obj.yml               |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/arm/grp.yml                   |  1 -
  spec/build/bsps/objarmgic.yml                 | 21 +++++++++++++
  spec/build/bsps/optarmgic-icc-igrpen0.yml     | 20 +++++++++++++
  spec/build/bsps/optarmgic-icc-igrpen1.yml     | 17 +++++++++++
  14 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/objarmgic.yml
  create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/optarmgic-icc-igrpen0.yml
  create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/optarmgic-icc-igrpen1.yml

diff --git a/bsps/include/dev/irq/arm-gicv3.h b/bsps/include/dev/irq/arm-gicv3.h
index a79368ebdf..4cd8cfaaed 100644
--- a/bsps/include/dev/irq/arm-gicv3.h
+++ b/bsps/include/dev/irq/arm-gicv3.h
@@ -116,9 +116,11 @@ extern "C" {
  #else /* ARM_MULTILIB_ARCH_V4 */
/* AArch64 GICv3 registers are not named in GCC */
-#define ICC_IGRPEN0 "S3_0_C12_C12_6, %0"
-#define ICC_IGRPEN1 "S3_0_C12_C12_7, %0"
+#define ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1 "S3_0_C12_C12_6, %0"
+#define ICC_IGRPEN1_EL1 "S3_0_C12_C12_7, %0"
  #define ICC_IGRPEN1_EL3 "S3_6_C12_C12_7, %0"
+#define ICC_IGRPEN0 ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1
+#define ICC_IGRPEN1 ICC_IGRPEN1_EL1
  #define ICC_PMR     "S3_0_C4_C6_0, %0"
  #define ICC_EOIR1   "S3_0_C12_C12_1, %0"
  #define ICC_SRE     "S3_0_C12_C12_5, %0"
@@ -300,20 +302,6 @@ static void gicv3_init_dist(volatile gic_dist *dist)
    }
  }
-/*
- * A better way to access these registers than special opcodes
- */
-#define isb() __asm __volatile("isb" : : : "memory")
-
-#define  WRITE_SPECIALREG(reg, _val)                                    \
-  __asm __volatile("msr  " __STRING(reg) ", %0" : : "r"((uint64_t)_val))
-
-#define  gic_icc_write(reg, val)            \
-do {                                        \
-  WRITE_SPECIALREG(icc_ ##reg ##_el1, val); \
-  isb();                                    \
-} while (0)
-
  static void gicv3_init_cpu_interface(uint32_t cpu_index)
  {
    uint32_t sre_value = 0x7;
@@ -334,8 +322,14 @@ static void gicv3_init_cpu_interface(uint32_t cpu_index)
      sgi_ppi->icspiprior[id] = PRIORITY_DEFAULT;
    }
- /* Enable interrupt groups 0 and 1 */
-  gic_icc_write(IGRPEN1, 1);
+  /* Initialize the group 0 and 1 interrupt enable */
+#ifdef BSP_ARM_GIC_ICC_IGRPEN0
+  WRITE_SR(ICC_IGRPEN0, BSP_ARM_GIC_ICC_IGRPEN0);
+#endif

I think more things will surface in this driver over time and configuring at the
per register level may become unwieldy. This write depends on the EL levels
available, secure/non-secure support and the boot wrapper used for the different
classes of devices. Maybe the config support and macro reflecting this would
serve us better over time?

I also thought about using a general define for this, however, the ICC_BPR0 and ICC_BPR1 have processor- and application specific values. My plan was to add BSP options for these registers in a follow up patch.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to