On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 9:32 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 22/3/2023 3:29 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > These patches look ok for rtems-net-legacy. > > Yes and again sorry for the wrong subject line. > > > In general, net-legacy is ok for maintenance patches. Any new features > > will be heavily scrutinized and need additional discussions. > > Agreed. These are maintenance changes only and there is a ticket. I think > this > repo needs tickets for changes so these release notes contain any changes. >
Is this easy to enforce with git rules? > > > Please run the python file through yapf consistent with > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/python-devel.html > > feel free to send the format fix separately. this should help reduce > > whitespace changes in the future patches to net-legacy. > > Good idea. Hmmm there is a few changes so I will add this as a separate > patch. > > > Thanks for the prompt review. A v2 coming. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
