On 16.06.23 06:35, Chris Johns wrote:
On 16/6/2023 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:
On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org
<mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:

      Hi,

      Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered
why so
      I checked the sources and to my surprise found:

      rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
      bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
      bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
      bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
      bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
      bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
      bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
      bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
      bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
      bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
      bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
      bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
      bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
      bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
      bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
      bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
      bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
      bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
      bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
      bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
      bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc


These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
were

Would like someone to concur.


      And for .cfg there is:

      rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
           191


Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no.
I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person to answer
this.
They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then since they
document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by the new build 
system.
Ah yes, thanks. What if the files are collected and archived?

I think we should just remove them. We can use the RTEMS 5 branch to look up the post-link actions if needed.

The RPU BSP is adding a new one. Is this what we want to see happen?

No, we don't want to see new ones.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to