On 26/7/2023 7:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The > clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by > anyone else (as I wait for changes to be accepted upstream). > > A few things to note: > * We can always manually override style with good reason. If you see > something like that in a patch, please let me know. > * I have started to avoid changing the __asm __ ... blocks, as > clang-format doesn't do a great job with those at the moment. > * clang-format also doesn't know how to indent broken if/for loops > like we prefer. So i may need to continue manual intervention on those > until I can get around to teaching it how. I believe that is doable, > but will take me some time to implement and get upstream. > * clang-format also has a preference to break function declarations > differently than we do. It will prefer to break after the function > return type/decorators, rather than in the parameter list. This may be > something we can tune. For now, I fix this manually. > > I may prepare a few more patches tomorrow, but I will leave these two > for the time being for feedback.
Is there a branch in a repo I can look at to see the files with the style applied? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel