On 4/8/2023 3:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04.08.23 00:27, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 2/8/2023 6:49 pm, Chris Johns wrote: >> > I am concerned about the compatibility to the ecosystem we have. Have you >> built >>> all the tests in the testsuite with this value set to something that is not >>> RTEMS default? I think a few things will break because of hard coding in >>> them. >> I have asked for test results and I have not seen any yet the patch has been >> merged? The change was not approved my me and is still not approved. > > Sorry I thought it was fine after answering your questions.
All good, I would like to finish the discusion. :) > Yes, I have tested this with the rtems7 tools. It was possible to build with > the rtems7 tools > before, however, the PROGRAM_PREFIX approach is better, since it allows also > the > build using vendor tools. We had some fixes for this recently: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-May/075321.html > > This is something the user need. What if a user adds or uses a prefix that does not conform to the standard format? I am assuming this is possible to do this, eg Gaisler's special prefix? Possible breakage is https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/rtemstoolkit/rld-cc.cpp#n457 ? Do we need to document any constraints around this option? > I have problems to send test reports by e-mail: Anything Amar or I can help with? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel