On 4/8/2023 4:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04.08.23 08:30, Chris Johns wrote: >>> Please understand there is a limited number people reviewing and it takes >>> time. >>>> I am blocked on the other changes you have recently posted. Adding which >>>> hosts >>>> you have built and tested this change on would help? >>> Sorry, Joel is rushing for the RTEMS 6 release. The patch is from 19.05.23. >>> A CI >>> system and pull requests would also help. >> Ah yes and I have raised an 7 related RSB sources fetch that need to be fix >> as >> well. My concern is release testing on hosts like MacOS M etc tend to find >> issues if it has not been tested. > > GitHub offers runners for macOS: > > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners > > I don't understand why we don't use the GitHub services for the project. It is > just a matter of adding a couple for text files to the repositories. You can > still run your own GitLab stuff in parallel. It is not one or another. You can > have both.
It is not a technical issue. Who legally owns the github account? It cannot be a single person and it cannot be a company. It could be a foundation but ours is not functioning enough to do this. Individuals can always set up builders and post to the builds list and that is no different to a private build server in a company but these is not part of the project or under its control. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel